David Dyer-Bennet writes: > Scott Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 15 January 2001 at 17:24:13 -0500 > > > And, since MXPS is not an accepted Internet standard, the (unlikely, > > but possible) situation where somebody has chosen an MX priority which > > isn't MXPS-compatible should be handled gracefully. > > I think that's the clinching argument; it's vital that people using MX > in full accordance with the RFCs who happen to hit our magic numbers > not get screwed. Why not ask him to change his MX number? There can be at most one host which has port 209 bound AND an MX priority in the 12800-13056 range. -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com | Government is the Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | fictitious entity by which 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | everyone seeks to live at Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | everyone else's expense.
- Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Johan Almqvist
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Russell Nelson
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Johan Almqvist
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Jurjen Oskam
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Johan Almqvist
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Scott Gifford
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patc... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc ... Russell Nelson
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-q... Scott Gifford
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Johan Almqvist
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Johan Almqvist
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patc... Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patc... Johan Almqvist
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patc... Russell Nelson
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc ... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Michael T. Babcock