Re: Qmail and Syslogd?

[Dave Sill]

"Collin B. McClendon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>In light of my recent delivery issues, I was curious as to whether syslogd
>may have anything to do with it? During a mail run of our mailing lists
>syslogd is hitting 90% processor usage or more and staying there. Just
>curious,

Why use syslog when there's a more reliable, secure, efficient, and
functional alternative? (Hint: multilog)

-Dave