On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Dave Sill wrote:
> Why use syslog when there's a more reliable, secure, efficient, and
> functional alternative? (Hint: multilog)
Dave,
I use qmail and at qmail the logs are generated by splogger but
at tcpserver logs are created at me by syslogd throu logger options.
I will say, that on my server tcpserver is used to control access
all available IP daemons (except Apache, sshd - this has got their
own access control systems) - telnetd, ftpd, rlogind, smtp, pop etc. etc.
On one of two servers, where works such method really syslogd sometimes
gets down :-(
Maybe I really should use multilog instead of syslogd?
How is your opinion?
Piotr
---
Piotr Kasztelowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[http://www.am.torun.pl/~pekasz]
