I asked something _similar_ last week. But it's not exactly the same.
See Chris Johnson's answer to "translating or remapping domains to another
domain", 2001/01/29
My situation was I wanted:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to go to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No changes to the username portion.
The answer to my situation (thanks to Chris) :
echo 'corp.rocketcash.com' >> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
echo 'corp.rocketcash.com:alias-rocketcash' >>
/var/qmail/control/virtualdomains
echo '| forward "$DEFAULT"@corp.netzero.net' > \
/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-rocketcash-default
But my understanding of your situation is:
Outside - > firewall -> MSX with AV -> Internal mailservers
u@aimtv -> u@aimtv -> u@aimtv
f@rocketcash -> fipl@netzero -> fipl@netzero
And now you also want
fipl@rocketcash -> fipl@netzero -> fipl@netzero
Looks possible but may require some modification - depends how you do the
firstname to longname thing.
Cheerio,
Link.
At 02:51 PM 05-02-2001 -0800, you wrote:
>I have a situation which leaves me (I think) caught between
>virtualdomain and smtproute files...
>
>We have qmail running on a firewall box and forwarding
>to the corporate exchange server...
>
>We have users from one domain:
>aimtv.com which we use smtproutes to forward directly
>to a virus scan box... all the email addresses in the aimtv
>domain match those found on the forwarding domain, so
>smtproutes is appropriate.
>
>I'd like all our domains to be that way, but each domain that
>the virus scan box checks needs extra licensing ($$)...
>
>so, we have another domain, corp.rocketcash.com...
>some email addresses are [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>the mail comes in and I use a .qmail file to forward these to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>future new addresses will be along the line of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] which will forward
>to the equivalent on corp.netzero.net....
>
>is there a way to catch all those future addresses and forward them to
>@corp.netzero.net w/o using smtproutes and without creating a separate
>.qmail for each new employee? would a catchall .qmail
>file be able to do that? i don't see how. it makes sense to use smtproutes
>but i cannot from what i can see.
>
>any suggestions?
>
>Thanks,
>--
>Michael Boyiazis
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Mail Architect, NetZero, Inc.
>
>
>
>
