On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:03:44AM -0400, Stuart Krivis wrote: > I would choose Solaris first for a high-volume web server. Suns have been > more reliable in my experience than any PC-based OS. Sun hardware, yes. Solaris, now. Solaris is slow, buggy and eats more resources than i could believe. > I've heard that qmail isn't happy on Solaris, but I figure that's a qmail > problem. :-) can you imagine the pain a solaris admin has when he thinks of inetd? every fork/exec cycles burns 8 or 9 times as much cpu power than under reasonable operating systems. > FreeBSD is also a very respectable OS. I wouldn't have any problem with it, > but I just think of Solaris first. A misjudgement. > just feels like a system, rather than a hodge-podge of parts. Solaris also > has this feel to it. How do you manage to ignore the /usr/ucb (and xpg4 and ...) compatibility braindamage? Regards, Uwe
- Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD Federico Edelman Anaya
- Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD Adam McKenna
- RE: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD David T. Ashley
- Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD Niles Rowland
- Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD Sean Chittenden
- Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD List Monkey
- OT: Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. Free... Stuart Krivis
- Re: OT: Re: Solaris vs. Linux... Henning Brauer
- Re: OT: Re: Solaris vs. Linux... Uwe Ohse
- Re: OT: Re: Solaris vs. L... Stuart Krivis
- Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD Henning Brauer
- Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD Alex Povolotsky
- Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD Sean C Truman
- OT: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD Steve Fulton
- Re: OT: Solaris vs. Linux vs... Adam McKenna
- Re: OT: Solaris vs. Linu... Stuart Krivis
- Re: OT: Solaris vs. ... Adam McKenna
- RE: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD John Doe
- Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD Ari Arantes Filho