Thanks for the info. Attempting to use qtp-newmodel now on my test machine. Hope it goes great!
-----Original Message----- From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 4:03 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Auth before RBL patch Gee you're fast! :) Erik Espinoza wrote: > Done! > > On 1/23/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> EE, >> The firewall.sh script needs to be modified on the main site to allow >> port >> 587 for submission. >> Just a reminder. ;) >> >> Dan Herbon wrote: >> > No I cannot telnet to port 587. ill look around. Thanks >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:47 PM >> > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com >> > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Auth before RBL patch >> > >> > No, it can be used with or without SSL. Is a firewall blocking the port >> > (standard toaster firewall does not), or port not being forwarded? >> (depends >> > on your configuration) >> > >> > Can you telnet into 587? >> > >> > Dan Herbon wrote: >> >> I've never used this port and when I set outlook to it, it just >> fails. Do >> > I >> >> have to set the server up with a SSL certificate or something? >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:32 PM >> >> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com >> >> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Auth before RBL patch >> >> >> >> Correct. >> >> >> >> On 1/23/07, Dan Herbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> So just to clarify, if I set my roaming users laptops to send through >> > port >> >>> 587 it will bypass the blacklists but will require authentication? >> I've >> >> been >> >>> having lots of trouble with the new zen.spamhaus.org blacklist >> since the >> >>> upgrade. Seems the PBL advisory list has every IP block of >> roadrunner on >> >> the >> >>> list which is now causing all my roaming users to have their emails >> > kicked >> >>> back even though they authenticate. >> >>> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:02 PM >> >>> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com >> >>> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Auth before RBL patch >> >>> >> >>> As time has gone by, a lot of isp's have been blocking outgoing port >> >>> 25 for all but their static users. I always recommend my users set >> >>> port 587 in case they use someone elses Wireless they can still >> use my >> >>> Toaster for outgoing without issue. There are advantages for using >> the >> >>> standard. >> >>> >> >>> Erik >> >>> >> >>> On 1/23/07, Sergey Menshikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>> Eric "Shubes" wrote: >> >>>> Sergey Menshikov wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi All, >> >>>> >> >>>> I have to accept e-mail from users in blacklisted IPs, so >> attached are >> >>>> the simple patches for qmail-smtpd and rblsmptd to delay RBL >> rejection >> >>>> until smtp DATA command is issued. >> >>>> >> >>>> * rblsmtpd with option -e, if IP is blacklisted, sets environment >> >>>> variable BLACKLISTMSG to rejection code and message and, in all >> >>>> cases, starts qmail-smtpd. >> >>>> * qmail-smptpd checks for BLACKLISTMSG at DATA command stage, and, >> >>>> if set, and not authenticated, outputs the message, aborting DATA >> >>>> command. >> >>>> >> >>>> Fairly trivial but I believe useful patch, I wonder if it could be >> >>>> included into distribution. >> >>>> >> >>>> I tested it on and still use it on my site, using rpmbuild against >> >>>> >> >>>> * ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.2.src.rpm >> >>>> * qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7.src.rpm >> >>>> >> >>>> Thank you! >> >>>> >> >>>> Best regards, >> >>>> Sergey Menshikov >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Sergey, >> >>>> >> >>>> The latest toaster now uses the standard smtp submission port (587), >> >> which >> >>>> does not check blacklists and requires authentication. I'm not >> certain >> >>> which >> >>>> version first contained this change, but it was after 1.3.7. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks, Eric, I did not know this :) >> >>>> >> >>>> Though asking all my friends and family to find their SMTP port >> setting >> >>> and >> >>>> change it to 587 is harder for me than patch qmail ;) >> >>>> >> >>>> Best regards >> >>>> Sergey >> >>>> >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> -Eric 'shubes' >> -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]