Dan,

Did you get your backup server problem worked out?  If so, what did you find?

Phil


-----Original message-----
From: Dan McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:11:03 -0500
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE

> Sam, et. al.
> 
> I would say that to get the best results out of SPAMDYKE, you DEFINITELY 
> want *IT* to handle the TLS. My reasoning is 2-fold:
>  1) I have an average of 15% of incoming SPAM that is attaching with TLS 
> (I thought this was odd, but apparently not)
>  2) I require TLS for my outbound mail (from my clients).... and THEY 
> TOO can be sources of SPAM. I'd like SPAMDYKE to equally fight inbound 
> AND outbound SPAM!
> 
> Just my thoughts. They were free to you, so take them at their face value.
> 
> Daniel McAllister, President
> IT4SOHO, LLC
> 
> "Take my advice... I won't be using it today!"
> 
> 
> Sam Clippinger wrote:
> > Actually, enabling TLS in spamdyke is the best solution.  When 
> > spamdyke handles the TLS, the remote server can't tell the difference 
> > -- if it was using TLS before, it should continue to do so.  However, 
> > because spamdyke decrypts the traffic, it can enable all of its 
> > filters (including graylisting, recipient blacklisting, etc).  If 
> > spamdyke simply passes TLS traffic through without decrypting it, most 
> > of its filters cannot operate.
> >
> > -- Sam Clippinger
> >
> > Davide Bozzelli wrote:
> >> Sam Clippinger ha scritto:
> >>> OK, I should be able to duplicate that setup to see if I can 
> >>> reproduce your error.  It may be a little while before I have the 
> >>> time, however.
> >>>
> >>> In the meantime, can you try enabling TLS support in spamdyke to see 
> >>> if this error persists?  Inside spamdyke, TLS passthrough is handled 
> >>> differently than TLS decoding.  If this is a spamdyke bug, you may 
> >>> be able to work around it.  Enabling TLS support will also allow all 
> >>> of spamdyke's filters to function, including graylisting.
> >>>
> >>> To enable TLS, you'll need to compile spamdyke with TLS support and 
> >>> use the "tls-certificate-file" directive in the configuration file.  
> >>> Your TLS certificate is probably located at:
> >>>     /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem
> >>>
> >>> -- Sam Clippinger
> >> I can confirm this bug, i've have the exact problems with a qmail 
> >> patched with jms combined patch that sends mail to a qmailtoaster 
> >> with spamdyke enabled without tls.
> >> By enabling tls in spamdyke the problem went down, but it's not the 
> >> correct way of work, cause the source mta don't do any tls handshake.
> >>
> >> Have fun,
> >> Davide
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>     QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>      QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
     QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to