The latest fixes are not yet packaged. Jake said that he hoped to get to it by the end of this week or over this coming weekend.
Helmut Fritz wrote: > I just did a complete upgrade with qtp-mewmodel (found as part of qtp-plus > package). Once we got the spamassassin things straight it worked great. If > all the fixes are not in there you will need to do a copied sandbox (unless > your system can do a unionfs sandbox). It is easy to try as each iteration > can be tested - and if it fails you get to start over and you should remove > your previous version of the sandbox. > > Eric, > Do you know if your changes are rolled out yet? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:52 AM > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question > > Igor Smitran wrote: >> In case i want to upgrade packages to a new version one by one, is it >> enough just to do: >> rpm -Uvh /usr/src/$BDIR/RPMS/$ARCH/package-name-*.rpm per package? > > Short answer, no. > >> Is there a procedure for an upgrade that gives minimum down time? >> >> Thank you > > Using the qtp-newmodel script (part of qmailtoaster-plus > http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com) will absolutely minimize your down time. > > You could use qtp-newmodel to do one package at a time, but that would be > risky (sometimes there are package interdependencies), and would increase > your total down time. IOW, it'd be pointless. Doing them all at once is > best. > > -- > -Eric 'shubes' > -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
