qtp-build-rpms v0.2.5 qtp-remove-pkgs v0.2.2 REMOVED spamassassin-toaster from sandbox (not for real) Building spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.14 ... qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.14 qtp-build-rpms - see /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log Build failed, Exiting.
+ install -m 0644 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/qmailtoaster.local.cf.bz2 /var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf.bz2 install: cannot create regular file `/var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf.bz2': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.79533 (%install) Jack D. Martin, Jr. ----- Original Message ---- From: Eric Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 12:27:28 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question What error (specifically) do you get with .14? Jack Martin wrote: > Helmut, > > What did you finally do to upgrade spamassassin, I used .14, and still have > the file not creating. > > Jack D. Martin, Jr. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Helmut Fritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 11:27:24 AM > Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question > > I just did a complete upgrade with qtp-mewmodel (found as part of qtp-plus > package). Once we got the spamassassin things straight it worked great. If > all the fixes are not in there you will need to do a copied sandbox (unless > your system can do a unionfs sandbox). It is easy to try as each iteration > can be tested - and if it fails you get to start over and you should remove > your previous version of the sandbox. > > Eric, > Do you know if your changes are rolled out yet? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:52 AM > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question > > Igor Smitran wrote: >> In case i want to upgrade packages to a new version one by one, is it >> enough just to do: >> rpm -Uvh /usr/src/$BDIR/RPMS/$ARCH/package-name-*.rpm per package? > > Short answer, no. > >> Is there a procedure for an upgrade that gives minimum down time? >> >> Thank you > > Using the qtp-newmodel script (part of qmailtoaster-plus > http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com) will absolutely minimize your down time. > > You could use qtp-newmodel to do one package at a time, but that would be > risky (sometimes there are package interdependencies), and would increase > your total down time. IOW, it'd be pointless. Doing them all at once is > best. > > -- > -Eric 'shubes' > -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
