Hmmmm. I presume this is the version I posted to the list, right? If so, please post more of the contents at the end of build-recent.log, beginning with: Installing /var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/usr/bin/sa-compile
Jack Martin wrote: > qtp-build-rpms v0.2.5 > qtp-remove-pkgs v0.2.2 > REMOVED spamassassin-toaster from sandbox (not for real) > Building spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.14 ... > qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.14 > qtp-build-rpms - see /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log > Build failed, Exiting. > > + install -m 0644 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/qmailtoaster.local.cf.bz2 > /var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf.bz2 > install: cannot create regular file > `/var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf.bz2': No > such file or directory > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.79533 (%install) > > > Jack D. Martin, Jr. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Eric Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 12:27:28 PM > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question > > What error (specifically) do you get with .14? > > Jack Martin wrote: >> Helmut, >> >> What did you finally do to upgrade spamassassin, I used .14, and still have >> the file not creating. >> >> Jack D. Martin, Jr. >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Helmut Fritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com >> Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 11:27:24 AM >> Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question >> >> I just did a complete upgrade with qtp-mewmodel (found as part of qtp-plus >> package). Once we got the spamassassin things straight it worked great. If >> all the fixes are not in there you will need to do a copied sandbox (unless >> your system can do a unionfs sandbox). It is easy to try as each iteration >> can be tested - and if it fails you get to start over and you should remove >> your previous version of the sandbox. >> >> Eric, >> Do you know if your changes are rolled out yet? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:52 AM >> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com >> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade question >> >> Igor Smitran wrote: >>> In case i want to upgrade packages to a new version one by one, is it >>> enough just to do: >>> rpm -Uvh /usr/src/$BDIR/RPMS/$ARCH/package-name-*.rpm per package? >> Short answer, no. >> >>> Is there a procedure for an upgrade that gives minimum down time? >>> >>> Thank you >> Using the qtp-newmodel script (part of qmailtoaster-plus >> http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com) will absolutely minimize your down time. >> >> You could use qtp-newmodel to do one package at a time, but that would be >> risky (sometimes there are package interdependencies), and would increase >> your total down time. IOW, it'd be pointless. Doing them all at once is >> best. >> >> -- >> -Eric 'shubes' >> > > -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
