Hi

Regarding the spam mail generated through a authenticated user, today i have
send a test mail and checked with gmail account for spamming, i changed the
from address as a...@xyz.com and i used the authentication through a valid
gmail account x...@gmail.com. The beauty is that the FROM address has changed
to x...@gmail.com instead of a...@xyz.com and the message is properly
delivered to the mentioned recipient.


NOTE
 Eventhough i changed the from address and tried to do spamming, gmail
server changes the from address as a authentiacted user email id, so their
IP will not be listed in RBL. Is it possible in qmailtoaster to implement
like this.

As per Rajesh suggestion, we can limit the number of connections later.

I think, by doing this we can prevent our server IP from rbl list.


Jake and Eric i am looking forward for your comments on this.



Best Regards
Vinay


On 12/12/09, Rajesh M <24x7ser...@24x7server.net> wrote:
>
> hi
>
> we run qmail toaster on our all our email servers. qmailtoaster provided
> great protection against external spam but to date i am quite helpless
> against spam coming from within the server or the misuse of the same by
> own customers
>
> i am quoting below my experiences
>
> 1) authenticated sender spamming
> qmailtoaster smtp is built in such a way that once authenticated it allows
> sending out emails immaterial of whether the envelope sender is a domain
> on the server or not.
>
> example in my outlook express i create a dummy email id ; x...@yahoo.com as
> the mail from and reply to. for authentication i use some
> use...@domain_on_server.com and password ... and thats it i can send any
> no of emails with the mailfrom as a dummy yahoo account. this is how
> spamming has been taking place thru my server since some smart hacker
> picks up the smtp auth userid and password of some client of mine and
> misuses it.
>
>
> 2) clients misusing the system
> my own clients can misuse the system. they purchase email service for one
> single domain and use the smtp auth information for sending out emails
> with the mailfrom as their other domains
>
> 3) at present there is no check on the number of emails per hour / per day
> been implemented, there is no such restrictions in qmail ...
>
> work around solutions that i am looking at is as such
>
> i have created absolutely non-standard ports for my clients
>
> i have analysed smtp traffic during different times of day example during
> night time the traffic is very low and during day time from 10 am to 6 pm
> it is at the peak
>
> i used simple iptables rules to block ips which trespass the limits
>
> one rule for daytime and one rule for night time which are added / removed
> automtically by a cron job.
>
> #### RULE BETWEEN 10 AM AND 6 PM
> iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 25 -i eth0 -m state --state NEW -m recent
> --set
> iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 25 -i eth0 -m state --state NEW -m recent
> --update --seconds 120 --hitcount 90 -j DROP
>
> ####  RULE BETWEEN 6 PM UPTO 10 AM
> iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 5225 -i eth0 -m state --state NEW -m
> recent --set
> iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 5225 -i eth0 -m state --state NEW -m
> recent --update --seconds 120 --hitcount 30 -j DROP
>
> also building a queue monitoring tool -- checking the queue and if the no
> of emails exceed a specified limit, the tool will pickup ips from the
> emails in the queue and block them
>
>
> thanks
> rajesh
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (
> www.vickersconsulting.com)
>    Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
>      If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
> packages.
>
>      To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
>     For additional commands, e-mail:
> qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
>
>
>

Reply via email to