hi eric
when the email arrives in the spam box its headers contained the
"delivered to" email id in the header so my script will know where to
which email id the message is to be delivered. so my concern about bcc is
resolved.
my second question is as such
which would be better
Simply move the email from the "centralized spambox" to the inbox of that
email id
Or use the qmail-queue program to reroute the message back to the queue
for delivery.
i don't want the email time stamps changed during this process.
thanks
rajesh
> Rajesh M wrote:
>>> Rajesh M wrote:
>>>> hi
>>>>
>>>> the current system is such that all the emails that are spam (ie
>>>> between
>>>> 5
>>>> and 8) get tagged as spam in subject line and are are routed to the
>>>> SPAM
>>>> folder which can be viewed via squirrelmail
>>>>
>>>> my questions
>>>>
>>>> 1) is it possible to route these to a common mailbox which will be
>>>> monitored by a system admin
>>>>
>>>> 2) if the mail is genuine spam then the it is left as it is
>>>>
>>>> 3) if the email has been wrongly classified then the administrator
>>>> will
>>>> move the email to another folder say notspam and then it will be
>>>> delivered
>>>> to the recepient's inbox
>>>>
>>>> rajesh
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Anything's possible. ;)
>>>
>>> This could be done I suppose. It sounds to me like you're talking about
>>> a centralized spambox. I'd look into the current spambox capability and
>>> see how to tweak it to do 1). 3) will take a bit of doing, but not
>>> much.
>>> A script could be written which would pipe emails in the notspam folder
>>> to the qmail-queue program for delivery, and remove them from the
>>> notspam folder.
>>>
>>> Personally, I'm not fond of the idea. Sounds to me like you're creating
>>> work for a sysadmin, which would be more appropriately done by the end
>>> user. I suppose it might be appropriate depending on your environment
>>> though.
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> hi
>>
>> thanks for the input
>>
>> how would such a script handle bcc ?
>>
>> rajesh
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm not positive, but I think that bcc is no longer in play at that
> point, so there would be nothing to handle. Unless I'm misunderstanding
> your question. Please describe a scenario, and we can hash it out.
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
> (www.vickersconsulting.com)
> Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
> installations.
> If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
> packages.
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
