Yes, but this is not the issue in, at least this specific case.  It's
definitely a recipient MX resolution issue...

Mike
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:to...@interazioni.it] 
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 7:50 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER

Michael, one more element of discussion.

If sender has (for error) domain with wrong MX in sender address, of 
course no following rcpt could be accepted, as initial acceptance phase 
of sender has not successed. This is unique case in which also server's 
sending is rejected as a whole.

Ciao!

Tonino


Il 14/11/2010 00:37, Michael Colvin ha scritto:
>
>> On 11/13/2010 07:16 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
>>> Il 13/11/2010 15:04, Martin Waschbuesch ha scritto:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I wonder about this one... First of all, I agree with Jake that MX
>>>> verification is rather important.
>>>> However, the problem at hand is also a nuisance: Why should one bad
>>>> address out of 15 in the list cause all mails to not be delivered?
>>>>
>>> Is this problem related to clients or to emails coming from servers?
>> This is a key question, as they should be treated differently. Incoming
>> messages need MX verification so that bounces have a better probability
>> of being deliverable. Submissions, on the other hand, are rejected
>> directly during the smtp session to the user's client, so there is no
>> bounce (as far as QMT is concerned) and thus no need for MX verification.
>>
>>> Double check with clients, because a lot of them stop sending as receive
>>> the first error back, while servers continue sending remaining
>> recipients.
>>> For my authenticated senders I've completely disabled chkuser, using a
>>> dedicated ip only for this purpose (relaying).
>>> If you cannot have a dedicated IP you can always use submission port,
>>> and setup a dedicated qmail-smtpd for this usage.
>> I like this solution. I've said before that I think that port 25
>> (incoming smtp) and port 587 (submission) should have separate tcp.smtp
>> files. Such configuration facilitates turning off chkuser on port 587,
>> which I like as a solution for this.
>>
>> Thanks for chiming in on this, Tonino.
>>
>
> I agree Jake, to some degree.  As Martin pointed out, the issue is that
this
> particular customer is sending to a list with 200+ on it.  When it bounces
> back saying ALL of them couldn't resolve an MX for the domain, that's an
> issue...  It's hard for them to keep their list clean, when they can't
tell
> which one is causing the bounce, and I can't really expect them to test
each
> account, or call each person on their distribution list.  Nor am I going
to
> do it.  :-)
>
> As far as whether it's a mail client issue, or server issue, I'm not sure.
> But, I think in my particular case, it's neither...Well, that is, it's not
> *MY* server.  This particular client has an Exchange server.  They send
> their e-mail from Outlook, to their Exchange server, which then uses my
> servers for relaying, or a "Smarthost"...
>
> This particular cluster of servers is used solely for filtering client
> e-mail inbound, and for some clients to use for outbound.  I have another
> cluster that I use for ISP "Access" customers (DSL, Dialup, Hosting, etc),
> but they are still using a non-toaster for outbound, so this issue hasn't
> surfaced, yet, but with most of them using Outlook to connect directly to
> the server, I'm assuming they'll get individual bounces back?
>
> I agree with, I think it was Eric, that fixing the actual issue with how
> CHKUSER handles these bad MX records would be better...  If it would only
> bounce the bad addresses, that would be preferred.  But, from what Tonino
> said, I'm now wondering if this isn't actually an issue with how Exchange
is
> handling CHKUSER's notification that a given address is "Bad"...
>
> I know during my testing, if I entered a bad e-mail domain via telnet
> session, it would give me the error message, but I could still enter
another
> address, and those would go through.  So, is this Exchange seeing the
reject
> message, and then just assuming the rest are bad?  It doesn't appear as
> though QMT is closing the session...So, this may be...
>
> I appreciate that you're switching to the stock CHKUSER setup in QMT2, but
I
> agree with you that this *IS* a valuable feature, and I would prefer to
have
> it enabled...  It just needs a little tweaking, or Exchange does...
>
> Michael J. Colvin
> NorCal Internet Services
> www.norcalisp.com
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
> Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
>      Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
>        If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>       Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.
>
>        To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
>       For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
>
>
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
         in...@zioni            Interazioni di Antonio Nati
    http://www.interazioni.it      to...@interazioni.it
------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
    Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
      If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
     Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.
     
      To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
     For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
    Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
      If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
     
      To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
     For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com


Reply via email to