Hi Eric, Noted your points. I will wait for someone to give me with compatible for COS5.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Eric Shubert <e...@shubes.net> wrote: > On 11/21/2014 09:03 PM, Eric Broch wrote: > >> By the way, are the packages for CentOS 5 no longer going to have the >> "toaster" designation? >> I noticed the file >> http://mirrors.qmailtoaster.com/testing/CentOS/5/i386/ >> clamav-0.98.5-0.qt.el5.i386.rpm >> has the ".qt." designation. >> > > COS5 QMT hosts can be either legacy (with -toaster designation) or new > (with .qt. designation) packages. In some cases, you might be able to mix > them, but I'm not going into that. Generally speaking, don't mix them. > However, you can build QMT with the new packages on COS5 if you'd like. I > don't right know why anyone would, unless that's they're only choice for > some reason. > > Note, I have not spun a clamav-toaster-0.98.5 version at this point. If > there's enough clammering for it (get it?), I may do this once the .qt. > version proves to be stable. > > Thanks. > > -- > -Eric 'shubes' > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com > For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com > > -- *Thanks & Best Regards,Manikandan.C*
