Sebastian Werner schrieb:
> Christian Boulanger schrieb:
>
>> Wouldn't a qx.OO.setProto("qx.core.Object") method be useful, which does
>> the first two lines, in order to save some typing? This method could
>> return qx.OO, so one could write
>>
>> qx.OO.setProto("qx.core.Object").addProperty({ name: "myproperty", type:
>> qx.constant.Type.STRING, defaultValue: null});
>>
>
> It's much easier than mentioned here. We don't really need a utility
> method for this.
>
> qx.Proto = qx.core.Object.prototype;
> qx.OO.addProperty();
>
Yeah, that sounds much nicer!
> However I would like to mention again, that this is not a good idea.
> Please use the userData support instead of custom runtime added properties.
>
> obj.setUserData("myproperty", "thevalue");
> alert(obj.getUserData());
>
User data doesn't support all the nice features of real properties (such
as the _modifyFoo methods - which I assume still exist in the 0.6
version??) and you cannot use them if you want to use XML markup to
support custom properties. So that's not an option for me.
Best, Christian
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
