> > The inheritance view was problematic with mixins and interfaces, > > which support multiple inheritance and thus cannot displayed in a > > tree. We removed it because we never used it ourselves and > > thought no one would miss it ;-) > > > > Are you just wondering where they are gone or do you really miss > > it? > > We certainly used it for our own classes. I will miss it as we have > a couple of complex trees of classes, as well as others > > You could just ignore mixins and show the main tree of inheritance, > perhaps just using the first base class for multiple inheritance.
Are you going to do anything about the inheritance tree display in the api viewer? I've just had cause to look at our inheritance tree again in my development. It's essential when you have two or more developers working on a complex project. I note that the online documentation for 0.7 shows an "inheritance tree" for each class, and direct subclasses as well (just like 0.6.6). Surely that information could be used? It's easier to use it when you can navigate it in a tree format. Does anyone else use the tree display of classes in the api viewer? Somebody support me here! Hugh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
