On 18/09/06, Johnson, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If everything is addressed using an extended JMS front end how complicated does the JMS API become? At what point do the abstractions required become too extreme? If implementing some of the basic use cases pushes the extended JMS API too far then I'd think from a developer's POV that would not be OK.
Yes this is perhaps the key point. Unless what is being proposed is what I read into Gordon's comments (I don't want to put words in your mouth so let me know if I'm misrerepresenting you Gordon) which is a strictly protocol-level API. So far I think the "extended JMS" is quite simple although I am perhaps slightly biased :-) RG
