Is it possible to get triggers to actually fix the properties rather than just abort the commit and tell you to fix them?
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 10:25 -0500, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Monday November 13 2006 10:14 am, Robert Greig wrote: > > On 13/11/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't object at all to adding it, but seeing as how we're part of a > > > much larger repository, could we even make such a change without > > > getting buy-in across all the other projects sharing this repository? > > > > Yes that could be a problem. What we could do is put in a test at the > > stop to do if the path of the commit starts with "qpid" so it only > > really applies to our project. Or read a file to check which commit > > paths to match on, since that would make it easy to roll out to other > > projects. > > Before spending much time on it, you probably should send a note to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] asking if it's possible and how to proceed. > > Adding hooks into SVN, even if it bails if it's not qpid, would affect ALL > commits as processes would need to be forked to do the validation and > such. Infrastructure would need to be involved to make sure that's > acceptable. > > That all said, I'd love it. It would be great if it could be updated to > handle all the auto_props, but even flagging the eol-style is a huge > help. >
