Hi,

Just keen that we try to keep our clients in step if possible, in terms of
approach. Anyhow, shall consider over the weekend :-)

The JIRA for the SSL is not too full of detail but still:

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6

The developer docs I'm aware of that might be useful (on authentication etc)
all hang off here for the java broker:

http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/qpid-developer-documentation.html

Noticed that the authentication child page has some info about config
properties for PLAIN/CRAM-MD5 - which you probably already know, but jic.

hth,
Bfn,
Marnie

On 1/12/07, Tomas Restrepo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Marnie,

>
> I'm a little out of my comfort zone in this area, but ...
>
> Not too keen to see the wrapping around AMQException subclassing being
> changed at the moment. I think we are just starting to see some
limitations
> in the way that exception management back to clients from the broker
works
> and would prefer to hold off until we have a little more clarity.

I just wanted to clarify that I was talking purely here about the .NET
client implementation, and not about changing anything at the broker
level.

I was kind of saying that from a user of the .NET client I think it would
be
more explicit if you could look directly at the actual exception type (i.e
.
catch an AMQAuthorizationException directly) instead of having to catch a
generic AMQException and then look at what it contains in the
InnerException.

Notice that AMQAuthorizationException already inherits from AMQException
so
you could still catch a super AMQException if you wanted so that would not
change. The issue here I'm bringing up is that we're basically returning
at
this point an AMQException with the message "unable to connect to broker"
that wraps the underlying AMQAuthorizationException. That's what I meant
when I said that a "generic" AMQException was being thrown instead of a
more
explicit subclass of it.

> I know we have a JIRA relating to SSL but not aware of anything which
> explains the authentication problem that you're seeing.

Cool. Any pointers about where to explore a bit more the SSL support in
the
java broker/client? I'd love to check it out since I'm guessing that's
another of those features as of yet missing from the .NET client :)


Tomas Restrepo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/





Reply via email to