Ah. Good news and bad, imho. Happy to include Ruby but a little concerned that it's not going to be release-able for reasons other than the code :-)
Regards, Marnie On 3/15/07, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marnie, 3 +1's means that the vote carries, and as we have no -1's or 0's all the components in the vote should be included in M2. i.e. Ruby carried also so it must be included. Regards, Carl. Marnie McCormack wrote: > Hi All, > > Thanks for your votes and input on the M2 Release vote thread. > > I have now tallied up the votes cast, and they look like this: > > [ +8 ] M2 Release inc Java, C++, .NET > [ +6 ] Python client (plus 2 abstentions) > [ +3 ] Ruby client (plus 5 abstentions) > > My reading of the discussions thus far is that the python is fairly well > used and thus maintained. The Ruby seems a bit behind this in status and > will shortly be subject to some additional effort (hopefully from Kevin). > > Thus, I'd conclude that we should concentrate our efforts on an M2 which > only includes: > > Java Broker (with a caveat on the clustered broker code) > Java Client > C++ Broker > C++ Client > .NET Client > Python Client > > I hope that this tallies up with the group consensus. I'll email > separately > on release branching and management. > > Thanks & Regards, > Marnie >
