On 28/04/2008, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Tomas - nice to hear from you ! > > Regards, > > Marnie > > > > On 4/27/08, Tomas Restrepo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Marnie, > > > > > I don't know of any samples though thinking about it I believe it was > > the > > > .NET guys that did some work on this stuff. > > > > > > Anyone know better/more ? > > > > I did most of the authentication support on the .NET client, > > implementing the core SASL support. Currently the .NET client itself > > should support Anonymous, CRAM-MD5, Digest, Plain and External (useful > > if eventually implicit SSL with client-side certificates are supported > > by the spec). > > > > From what I remember, though, the Java client only supported Plain and > > CRAM-MD5 (and one of them had an issue which I do not know if it was > > fixed or not). > > > > -- > > Tomas Restrepo > >
I've captured this thread here : http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Qpid+Interoperability+Documentation#sasl so it would be good for those better in the know to update the docs. Also if someone has a link or two ticks to put a description of AMQPLAIN in that would be great. So far .NET is winning with 5 implementations thanks to the good work my Tomas! Java has 4, C++ Broker 3 and the rest are limping behind with just the 1 implementation. Cheers Martin -- Martin Ritchie
