Hi Aidan,
I've started coding again,that's my pleasure.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Aidan Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 5:51 AM, lahiru gunathilake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >>> The other option would be to specify it to list. Maybe something like:
> >>>
> >>> queue list -v <vhost> -n <name>
> >>
> >> I will implement like this.
> >>
> > I think we want to get a single object with info command so this apply
> for
> > info command not with list command.
>
> I think virtual host is still relevant for list. They're conceptually
> separate, so often (but not always) you're only interested in one
> vhost but not the others.
>
> > Why don't we use a standard way to give arguments, with list we give
> > arguments with minuse("-") sign so why don't we use the same with info
> > command, I think we have to use -n to specify the object name with info
> > whereas we use the same thing with list which leads to less confusion
> with
> > users. And from the beginning I started developing commands in the normal
> > way with minus sign and argument value.
> >
> > What do you think ?
>
> I think it's worth allowing both forms, it gives the user more
> flexibility and lets things "just work". To quote Postel's Law: "be
> conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from
> others."
I have implemented the -v option for list command. Can I allow implement
command arguments only with minus sign for now.I think I can implement other
features later on. I mean after I finish all the functionality with Qpid
CLI.I have committed my code today check the -v option with list and info
commands.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Lahiru
>
>
> I'll be on GTalk shortly if you want to chat about this in real time.
>
> - Aidan
> --
> Apache Qpid - World Domination through Advanced Message Queueing
> http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid
>
