On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 11:52 +0100, Robert Godfrey wrote: > 2008/10/20 Aidan Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Has anybody started on that? I know there's been some work done on > > making it easier to do with the broker. Are there any design docs? > > > My refactoring of the broker took into account some of the things we > will encounter in 0-10, such as changes to flow control and a distinct > "acquired" state for message entries. > > I think the biggest hurdle will be to re-engineer the broker to handle > the 0-8 and 0-10 stuff without making it such a dogs breakfast as the > client. I really don't want to see the same level of separateness in > the broker if at all possible. > > I think I would start by getting the 0-10 style I/O stuff into the > broker and removing the remaining MINA-isms ... We can throw in the > 0-10 stack but then need to get some sort of model of Channel/Session > that fits comfortably in the broker and works with the 0-8/9 and 0-10 > dispatch mechanisms.
So the issues that are reported against Java broker need to fix in this process, right ? -Rajika -- http://wso2.org http://llvm.org http://www.osdev.org
