On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 13:00 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote: > Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 11:52 +0100, Robert Godfrey wrote: > > > >> 2008/10/20 Aidan Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >>> Has anybody started on that? I know there's been some work done on > >>> making it easier to do with the broker. Are there any design docs? > >>> > >>> > >> My refactoring of the broker took into account some of the things we > >> will encounter in 0-10, such as changes to flow control and a distinct > >> "acquired" state for message entries. > >> > >> I think the biggest hurdle will be to re-engineer the broker to handle > >> the 0-8 and 0-10 stuff without making it such a dogs breakfast as the > >> client. I really don't want to see the same level of separateness in > >> the broker if at all possible. > >> > >> I think I would start by getting the 0-10 style I/O stuff into the > >> broker and removing the remaining MINA-isms ... We can throw in the > >> 0-10 stack but then need to get some sort of model of Channel/Session > >> that fits comfortably in the broker and works with the 0-8/9 and 0-10 > >> dispatch mechanisms. > >> > > > > So the issues that are reported against Java broker need to fix in this > > process, right ? > > > > -Rajika > > > > Best is to hit Rob and Rafi up if you want to help out with the 0-10 > broker work. They have spent > the most time looking into how best to do it as far as I know. I am sure > they will be glad for any > extra help they can get. Yes, I would like to contribute to the Qpid project and get Qpid java broker 0-10 specification support. Any guide on the JIRAs which should be get fixed for 0-10 specification support of Java broker would be highly appreciated. Thanks!
-Rajika > > Carl. > > -- http://wso2.org http://llvm.org http://www.osdev.org
