Marnie McCormack wrote:
Hi,
I think that we should discuss options here i.e. we have a defined process
for ensuring our code quality. If this is not working then we should agree
the outcome i.e. if you don't have an item reviewed within x weeks then the
commit is reverted from trunk ? (For the Java items, we should not be
releasing anything not reviewed iiuc our approach here.)
Drastic I know, but it's not cricket imho to have agreed to adopt an
approach and then have Aidan be the policeman for the project.
Thoughts ?
I am not sure this will improve code quality, but rather just create
frustration. Stuff that we are
doing now to close down the release I believe has a higher impact on
improving code quality.
Carl.
