Sure thing. My cursory testing today wasn't very fruitful, but that's
largely because I don't know what I'm doing!
Not sure if this is useful info, but here's what I found:
Server: qpidd - 0.2-5.fc7.i386
Client: qpid-java-1.0-incubator-M1-bin-client
Java code:
public static void main(String argv) throws Exception {
// this blocks forever:
AMQConnection conn = new AMQConnection("amqp://guest:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/test?brokerlist='tcp://turbo.bitmechanic.com:5672'");
// We never get here:
System.out.println("Got connection!");
}
Output on Java side:
main 2007-10-24 16:12:07,631 INFO [apache.qpid.client.AMQConnection]
Connection:amqp://guest:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/test?brokerlist='tcp://turbo.bitmechanic.com:5672'
main 2007-10-24 16:12:07,728 WARN [qpid.client.transport.TransportConnection]
Using Mina NIO
main 2007-10-24 16:12:07,744 INFO [
qpid.client.transport.SocketTransportConnection] send-buffer-size = 32768
main 2007-10-24 16:12:07,744 INFO [
qpid.client.transport.SocketTransportConnection] recv-buffer-size = 32768
main 2007-10-24 16:12:07,788 INFO [
qpid.client.transport.SocketTransportConnection] Attempting connection to
turbo.bitmechanic.com/209.40.199.163:5672
AnonymousIoService-3 2007-10-24 16:12:07,938 WARN [
apache.qpid.framing.AMQDataBlockDecoder] AMQDataBlockDecoder does not handle
frame type 9
Output on server side:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# qpidd -t
WARNING: Persistence not enabled, no recovery of queues or messages.
Listening on port 5672...
INIT [0x98642c0]
SENT [0x98642c0]: Frame[channel=0; request(id=1,mark=0): ConnectionStart:
versionMajor=8; versionMinor=0; serverProperties={}; mechanisms=PLAIN;
locales=en_US]
Not sure if the C++ broker and Java M1 client are designed to interop at
this point. That's sort of what it looks like -- some wire protocol
mismatch.
any ideas? or is this just user error?
-- James
On 10/24/07, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> James,
>
> I expect we will be pushing an update soon.. If you want to help do some
> of the shake
> down testing on the next release, shoot and I will see if I can get an
> update pushed in
> the next few days.
>
> Carl.
>
>
> James Cooper wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Just stumbled on your project today. Looking for something a bit easier
> for
> > my SAs to install than ActiveMQ and wanted interop between Python/Java.
> > This could be the ticket.
> >
> > Looks like the users list is just getting spun up.
> >
> > First question: Is it productive for me to start doing some testing
> against
> > the qpidd that Fedora 7 ships with? I just did a naive "yum install
> qpidd"
> > and it fires up. Since you guys are moving pretty quickly I'm not sure
> if
> > reports I make about that build will be useful for you.
> >
> > Are there plans to release patch releases to the yum repository servers?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > -- James
> >
> >
>
>
