Hi Carl,
Thanks for the quick reply. Still no dice, but the results are a little
different.
On the server I ran:
yum remove qpidd
rpm -Uvh qpidc-0.2-8.i386.rpm
rpm -Uvh qpidd-0.2-8.i386.rpm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# qpidd -t
Re-ran my test program.
Output from Java client:
main 2007-10-24 17:05:56,407 INFO [apache.qpid.client.AMQConnection]
Connection:amqp://guest:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/test?brokerlist='tcp://turbo.bitmechanic.com:5672'
main 2007-10-24 17:05:56,502 WARN [qpid.client.transport.TransportConnection]
Using Mina NIO
main 2007-10-24 17:05:56,515 INFO [
qpid.client.transport.SocketTransportConnection] send-buffer-size = 32768
main 2007-10-24 17:05:56,516 INFO [
qpid.client.transport.SocketTransportConnection] recv-buffer-size = 32768
main 2007-10-24 17:05:56,814 INFO [
qpid.client.transport.SocketTransportConnection] Attempting connection to
turbo.bitmechanic.com/209.40.199.163:5672
Output from qpidd:
2007-Oct-24 17:05:50 info Persistence not enabled, no recovery attempted.
2007-Oct-24 17:05:50 info Listening on port 5672
2007-Oct-24 17:05:56 debug INIT [75.172.72.232:49723]
2007-Oct-24 17:05:56 debug SENT [75.172.72.232:49723]: Frame[channel=0;
ConnectionStartBody: version-major=8; version-minor=0; server-properties={};
mechanisms=PLAIN; locales=en_US]
So the error message on the client went away, but the AMQConnection()
constructor never returns.
thoughts?
-- James
On 10/24/07, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> ok, yes I see the issue.. it is different versions of the wire protocol.
>
> We build on every check-in. Builds that all the tests pass are posted at
> http://rhm.et.redhat.com/download/
>
> If you pick up the packages with *-0.2-*.rpm the latest of cpp broker, cpp
> client, java client and python client will all work together. I'll get this
> pushed to yum repo. Let us know if you find any issues and so we can fix.
>
> Carl.
>
>
> James Cooper wrote:
>
> Sure thing. My cursory testing today wasn't very fruitful, but that's
> largely because I don't know what I'm doing!
>
> Not sure if this is useful info, but here's what I found:
>
> Server: qpidd - 0.2-5.fc7.i386
> Client: qpid-java-1.0-incubator-M1-bin-client
>
> Java code:
>
> public static void main(String argv) throws Exception {
> // this blocks forever:
> AMQConnection conn = new AMQConnection(" amqp://guest:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> /test?brokerlist='tcp://turbo.bitmechanic.com:5672'");
> // We never get here:
> System.out.println("Got connection!");
> }
>
> Output on Java side:
>
> main 2007-10-24 16:12:07,631 INFO [apache.qpid.client.AMQConnection]
> Connection:amqp://guest:[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]/test?brokerlist='tcp://turbo.bitmechanic.com:5672'
> main 2007-10-24 16:12:07,728 WARN [
> qpid.client.transport.TransportConnection ] Using Mina NIO
> main 2007-10-24 16:12:07,744 INFO [
> qpid.client.transport.SocketTransportConnection] send-buffer-size = 32768
> main 2007-10-24 16:12:07,744 INFO [
> qpid.client.transport.SocketTransportConnection] recv-buffer-size = 32768
> main 2007-10-24 16:12:07,788 INFO [
> qpid.client.transport.SocketTransportConnection] Attempting connection to
> turbo.bitmechanic.com/209.40.199.163:5672
>
> AnonymousIoService-3 2007-10-24 16:12:07,938 WARN [
> apache.qpid.framing.AMQDataBlockDecoder] AMQDataBlockDecoder does not
> handle frame type 9
>
> Output on server side:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# qpidd -t
> WARNING: Persistence not enabled, no recovery of queues or messages.
> Listening on port 5672...
> INIT [0x98642c0]
> SENT [0x98642c0]: Frame[channel=0; request(id=1,mark=0): ConnectionStart:
> versionMajor=8; versionMinor=0; serverProperties={}; mechanisms=PLAIN;
> locales=en_US]
>
> Not sure if the C++ broker and Java M1 client are designed to interop at
> this point. That's sort of what it looks like -- some wire protocol
> mismatch.
>
> any ideas? or is this just user error?
>
> -- James
>
> On 10/24/07, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> >
> > James,
> >
> > I expect we will be pushing an update soon.. If you want to help do some
> >
> > of the shake
> > down testing on the next release, shoot and I will see if I can get an
> > update pushed in
> > the next few days.
> >
> > Carl.
> >
> >
> > James Cooper wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > Just stumbled on your project today. Looking for something a bit
> > easier for
> > > my SAs to install than ActiveMQ and wanted interop between
> > Python/Java.
> > > This could be the ticket.
> > >
> > > Looks like the users list is just getting spun up.
> > >
> > > First question: Is it productive for me to start doing some testing
> > against
> > > the qpidd that Fedora 7 ships with? I just did a naive "yum install
> > qpidd"
> > > and it fires up. Since you guys are moving pretty quickly I'm not
> > sure if
> > > reports I make about that build will be useful for you.
> > >
> > > Are there plans to release patch releases to the yum repository
> > servers?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > -- James
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
