> > (I find arguments of the sort "developers of free software A are wasting
> > their time - they should instead help improving software B" extremely
> > pointless. AFAIK nobody ever criticised a company for competing with
> > another company)
> 
> Yes, it's probably as pointless as complaining about the
> fragmentation of unix into sysv, bsd, solaris, aix, hpux
> with their arbitrary differences back in the day, but with
> free software it at least makes sense to be aware of the
> prior art and use as much as you can from it.  But,
> I'm not saying that the project shouldn't exist, just that
> sendmail has a lot of functionality to duplicate, and that
> if your reason for not using sendmail was that it did not
> let you control it in perl, that's not true any more.

Please end this thread.

The qpsmtpd list is not the right place for sendmail and milter
advocacy.

-R (who has absolutely nothing against sendmail, and happily runs it
on several production systems.)

Reply via email to