On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 13:33, Topaz M. Bott wrote: > > > Not by accepting all messages only on listed valid domains. But yes > that was a problem; just as it was a problem for stock sendmail in the > 90's.
I've never seen a sendmail installation that did not check against the valid local and virtual users and aliases before accepting a message. > > So, if someone > > sends a big file to a large group of people (which my users > > often do), it hogs the bandwidth of that office link long > > enough for people to complain. This can also be a problem > > on an internet link if you have a limited uplink rate. Other > > mailers would group the recipients to the same next-hop > > destination. > > > For ppl to complain? Don't buy that at all. On a frame? Sorry but > going to call you on that. Qmail can easily bury a fractional-T frame by itself and email isn't our only use for it. And my users like to complain. How do you control outbound bandwidth use when qmail explodes the copies? > Sendmail isn't complicated; nor is postfix, exim, or qmail. OK, that makes one of us that thinks that... -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
