The patch itself looks fine, I'm not sure whether we actually should
support this or not.

(It also needs an update to README.plugins, and maybe should be called
data_headers_end, but those are little things.)

Anyone else want to chime in?


Karl Y. Pradene wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 23:24:39 -0800 Ask Bjørn Hansen <a...@develooper.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Feb 7, 2009, at 6:25, Karl Y. Pradene wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > is it possible add a hook at the end of headers?
> > 
> > Hi Karl,
> > 
> > Look in data_respond in lib/Qpsmtpd/SMTP.pm -- it would be pretty
> > easy to add.  Look for the line that says "$in_header = 0;"
> > 
> > I'm not sure it'd be useful though, because the only way you can
> > avoid receiving the data anyway at that point would be just dropping
> > the connection -- and well behaved mailers will just try and try
> > again after that.
> > 
> > Of course if it's spam or a virus it's unlikely to reconnect more or  
> > less because you drop the connection, so I guess that it could be  
> > worthwhile...
> > 
> > 
> >    - ask
> > 
> 
> Here the two patches I made.
> 
> -- 
> Karl Y. Pradene

Reply via email to