I think Jose's argument was persuasive, let's just add it. I didn't
understand why one line resetting/setting/... the headers in the
transaction object was removed; but I didn't look that closely.
Karl - your English is better than many who pretend to be fluent or
even native speakers. :-)
(sorry about the top posting)
- ask
--
http://develooper.com
On Feb 9, 2009, at 6:11, "Karl Y. Pradene" <k...@ailleurs.org> wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:29:14 -0800 Robert Spier <rsp...@pobox.com>
wrote:
The patch itself looks fine, I'm not sure whether we actually should
support this or not.
We can try.
(It also needs an update to README.plugins, and maybe should be
called
data_headers_end, but those are little things.)
I can do it if you accept the patch, but, like you can see, my english
is bad. It will be better if anyone else update the doc.
--
Karl Y. Pradene
