Well, before
you boys talk about others' lack of reading and comprehension
skills,
consider the
following:
9/29/2004 there was a post to this
list. It read in part:
John Sielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the qrplist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am sure gald Thom got that dissenting opinion posted. Just found one
reason it was so hard to find:
> I can't reveal the contents of my dissenting
> view under threat of legal action by the ARRL",
> Skip Teller (KH6TY) 9/11/05
Isn't THAT somethin' ?
To which I responded:
Sept
11, 2005 is nearly a year from now.....
Who's
got the time machine ???
de
K4WWD
Now, what I was trying to point out was the
quote was ante-dated (Just try doing that with a
check)
by nearly a year. And I was just trying
to ask.... "What's up with that?
NO ONE even seemed to notice or acknowledge the
date mix-up. I am not trying to be cute
or
sarcastic here. But isn't it
ironic that all you fellows who comment on others did not process
the
information correctly....?
Information processing must be a relative thing. The things that
we
do not consider relevant or important, we just
ignore (like most of you will do with this
post).
Just some food for
thought.......
Signed, an inconsiderate smat-ass
sarcastic asshole (luckily ignored by most)
K4WWD
