On 13 April 2015 at 13:55, André Hartmann <andre.hartm...@iseg-hv.de> wrote: > >>> I hope it's acceptable workflow, as two other developers that joined >>> my efforts are based on GitHub, and GitHub simlifies our collaboration a >>> lot. >> >> Every author needs to agree to the Contribution Licensee Agreement, so >> make sure that everyone that joins you understands and signs that CLA. > > Maybe a wip (work in progress) branch on Qt Gerrit is the better choise? > > Pros: > - All contributors sign the CLA, so there's no licence problems later > - You get the Qt Sanity Bot (and human reviewers) checking the coding > style > - The code is under broader review, maybe more contributions come in > - You make it easy for others to check out that branch and test it > - When the work is finished, the branch could easily be merged > - Further work after the initial release has to be done on Gerrit anyway > > Cons: > - You and your contributors need to setup and learn Gerrit, > but you will need to anyway, and I think the other two already did :)
André, thank you very much for outlining the pros & cons. We've been 'converted' :) and we've decided to go for the recommended Gerrit way. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator