I like the idea of a dedicated QTest output pane - will you be able to double-click on failures to jump directly to the code? That would be brilliant.
2009/10/26 Bravo.Alex <alex.br...@igt.com> > > Plus that it's not so high in the list of things to do. > > > > If you are talking about qtcrea...@nokia team, it makes a lot of sense. > > But that's why you guys opened development to outside world, right? > > So that we can help you improve already great product. > > > > > > So, back to qtestlibplugin: > > After bringing it back from the dead, I realized that the architecture of > this plugin might need adjustment: > > Right now it has its own type of output “Test Results” (just like “Build > Issues”, “Application Output” and 2 more). > > But, as this picture shows, there’s not much space for different types of > output: > > > > Besides it doesn’t make much sense to “pollute” IDE’s screen with “Test > Results” button and list entry > > for applications that have nothing to do with QTestLib. > > > > It looks like there should be as little presence for this plugin as > possible in the IDE’s GUI. > > Ideally, this plugin should show itself only if output of a program is in > QTestLib format. > > > > Thus this plugin really provides a different format of “Application > Output”, not a different output pane. > > > > So proposed adjustment to this plugin is to be able to have several formats > of “Application Output”. > > By default it’s “raw” output, with the ability to switch to a different > format. > > In case of qtestlibplugin it can be “test results” and “benchmark results” > formats. > > Other plugins could have/add their own formats. > > > > What do you guys think? > > > > Alex > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: qt-creator-boun...@trolltech.com [mailto: > qt-creator-boun...@trolltech.com] On Behalf Of Eike Ziller > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 4:00 AM > To: qt-creator@trolltech.com > Subject: Re: [Qt-creator] plugin_qtestlib > > > > > > On Oct 20, 2009, at 7:24 PM, ext Bravo.Alex wrote: > > > > > Why is it dead: > > > a) it’s obsolete, we now have a new XYZ plugin supporting > > > QTestLib in Qt Creator > > > b) the author is working on something else and doesn’t have > > > time/interest to work on it > > > c) it didn’t do much, so it’s not worth maintaining > > > d) nobody needs it, we are satisfied with running tests through > > > test.pl > > > > I suppose it's b) and c). Plus that it's not so high in the list of > > things to do. > > The only "maybe" still useful parts of the code in the plugin is > > probably the interaction/parsing of the QTestLib output. > > > > ++ Eike > > > > > Alex > > > > > > On Tuesday 20 October 2009 17:47:42 ext Bravo.Alex wrote: > > > > I'm not very successful in finding any info about plugin_qtestlib. > > > > There's not many comments in the source code either. > > > > > > > > plugins.pro says this: > > > > plugin_qtestlib \ # this seems to be dead > > > > > > > > The source tree on gitorious.org is missing > > > QTestLibPlugin.pluginspec for > > > > it. > > > > > > > > Does anybody know what it was supposed to do? > > > It's dead and the code probably is not very useful anymore either. > > > > > > daniel > > > > > > <ATT00001..txt> > > > > -- > > Eike Ziller > > Software Engineer > > Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks > > Phone +49 (0)30 6392 3255 > > Fax +49 (0)30 6392 3256 > > E-mail eike.zil...@nokia.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Qt-creator mailing list > > Qt-creator@trolltech.com > > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > Qt-creator@trolltech.com > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > >
<<image002.jpg>>
_______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
