One other thing I noticed, is that the Qt Creator installer tells me, for Ubuntu / Debian, to run: sudo apt-get install libglib2.0-dev libSM-dev libxrender-dev libfontconfig1-dev libxext-dev sudo apt-get install libgl-dev libglu-dev
However, this did not work for openSUSE. So I wonder, maybe I need to look for the equivilent of apt-get for openSUSE... On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Elfen <pem.accounts.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > er, you can uninstall with /opt/qtsdk-2010.02/bin/uninstall > > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Elfen <pem.accounts.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> hmmm... And now I have to figure out how to uninstall /opt/qtsdk-2010.02/ >> ... >> >> >> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Elfen <pem.accounts.s...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> > If you use the qt creator which comes with suse this is no problem. >>> >>> okay, but Qt Creator 1.2 is really old? I wonder how long until the >>> openSUSE repo has Qt Creator 2.0? Plus, if I'm doing cross-platform >>> development... Isn't it best to have Qt Creator 1.3 on all platforms? (And >>> Qt Creator 2.0 when it's released). >>> >>> >>> >>> > You probably need to tell Qt Creator about your new Qt installation >>> (Tools->Options->Qt4->Versions). It is a known issue in 1.3, that the >>> installer writes the initial Qt Creator settings *for the root user* if you >>> install as root. So, if you'd start Qt Creator as root user, it would >>> already know about the new Qt version in /opt, but if you start as any other >>> user, it doesn't and you have to tell it manually. >>> >>> You mean /opt/qtsdk-2010.02/qt/bin/qmake ? Yes this worked. However, >>> when I open a project, now it says I have to copy the project to a writable >>> location, to edit or compile the sample project. >>> >>> So, overall, I guess I generally understand the difference... >>> /opt/qtsdk-2010.02/ is read-only and meant for the system,. While >>> /home/user/[my user name]/qtsdk-2010.02/ is writable and meant only for my >>> user. However, I still don't know which is the "right" / "best" / "ideal" >>> choice. Sounds like the default of ( /user/[my user name]/qtsdk-2010.02/ ) >>> is easier... unless I missed something? >>> >>> >>> thank you for info >>> >>> >>> 2010/5/3 Thorbjørn Lindeijer <thorbjorn.lindei...@nokia.com> >>> >>> On 04/30/2010 10:04 AM, ext Alex Richardson wrote: >>>> >> I wonder if Qt Creator should make /opt/qt-sdk-2010.02 the default >>>> install >>>> >> path (instead of /home/[user name]/qt-sdk-2010.02), since that's the >>>> >> official FHS standard. >>>> > >>>> > The problem is that a normal user usually does not have write >>>> permission to /opt/, so installing to >>>> > the home directory is safer. >>>> >>>> Exactly. Also, when you run the installer as root, it already defaults >>>> to installing in /opt. >>>> >>>> That you don't get a GUI installer when running with sudo is strange. At >>>> least on Ubuntu this works fine for me. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Bjørn >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thorbjørn Lindeijer >>>> Software Engineer >>>> Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Qt-creator mailing list >>>> Qt-creator@trolltech.com >>>> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator >>>> >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
