That would be YAST, although the package names might be slightly different.
/s/ Adam On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Elfen <pem.accounts.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > One other thing I noticed, is that the Qt Creator installer tells me, for > Ubuntu / Debian, to run: > sudo apt-get install libglib2.0-dev libSM-dev libxrender-dev > libfontconfig1-dev libxext-dev > sudo apt-get install libgl-dev libglu-dev > > However, this did not work for openSUSE. > > So I wonder, maybe I need to look for the equivilent of apt-get for > openSUSE... > > > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Elfen <pem.accounts.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> er, you can uninstall with /opt/qtsdk-2010.02/bin/uninstall >> >> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Elfen <pem.accounts.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> hmmm... And now I have to figure out how to uninstall >>> /opt/qtsdk-2010.02/ ... >>> >>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Elfen <pem.accounts.s...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > If you use the qt creator which comes with suse this is no problem. >>>> >>>> okay, but Qt Creator 1.2 is really old? I wonder how long until the >>>> openSUSE repo has Qt Creator 2.0? Plus, if I'm doing cross-platform >>>> development... Isn't it best to have Qt Creator 1.3 on all platforms? >>>> (And >>>> Qt Creator 2.0 when it's released). >>>> >>>> >>>> > You probably need to tell Qt Creator about your new Qt installation >>>> > (Tools->Options->Qt4->Versions). It is a known issue in 1.3, that the >>>> > installer writes the initial Qt Creator settings *for the root user* if >>>> > you >>>> > install as root. So, if you'd start Qt Creator as root user, it would >>>> > already know about the new Qt version in /opt, but if you start as any >>>> > other >>>> > user, it doesn't and you have to tell it manually. >>>> >>>> You mean /opt/qtsdk-2010.02/qt/bin/qmake ? Yes this worked. However, >>>> when I open a project, now it says I have to copy the project to a writable >>>> location, to edit or compile the sample project. >>>> >>>> So, overall, I guess I generally understand the difference... >>>> /opt/qtsdk-2010.02/ is read-only and meant for the system,. While >>>> /home/user/[my user name]/qtsdk-2010.02/ is writable and meant only for my >>>> user. However, I still don't know which is the "right" / "best" / "ideal" >>>> choice. Sounds like the default of ( /user/[my user name]/qtsdk-2010.02/ ) >>>> is easier... unless I missed something? >>>> >>>> >>>> thank you for info >>>> >>>> >>>> 2010/5/3 Thorbjørn Lindeijer <thorbjorn.lindei...@nokia.com> >>>>> >>>>> On 04/30/2010 10:04 AM, ext Alex Richardson wrote: >>>>> >> I wonder if Qt Creator should make /opt/qt-sdk-2010.02 the default >>>>> >> install >>>>> >> path (instead of /home/[user name]/qt-sdk-2010.02), since that's the >>>>> >> official FHS standard. >>>>> > >>>>> > The problem is that a normal user usually does not have write >>>>> > permission to /opt/, so installing to >>>>> > the home directory is safer. >>>>> >>>>> Exactly. Also, when you run the installer as root, it already defaults >>>>> to installing in /opt. >>>>> >>>>> That you don't get a GUI installer when running with sudo is strange. >>>>> At >>>>> least on Ubuntu this works fine for me. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Bjørn >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thorbjørn Lindeijer >>>>> Software Engineer >>>>> Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Qt-creator mailing list >>>>> Qt-creator@trolltech.com >>>>> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator >>>> >>> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > Qt-creator@trolltech.com > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > > _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
