That would be YAST, although the package names might be slightly different.

/s/ Adam

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Elfen <pem.accounts.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One other thing I noticed, is that the Qt Creator installer tells me, for
> Ubuntu / Debian, to run:
> sudo apt-get install libglib2.0-dev libSM-dev libxrender-dev
> libfontconfig1-dev libxext-dev
> sudo apt-get install libgl-dev libglu-dev
>
> However, this did not work for openSUSE.
>
> So I wonder, maybe I need to look for the equivilent of apt-get for
> openSUSE...
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Elfen <pem.accounts.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> er, you can uninstall with /opt/qtsdk-2010.02/bin/uninstall
>>
>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Elfen <pem.accounts.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> hmmm...  And now I have to figure out how to uninstall
>>> /opt/qtsdk-2010.02/ ...
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Elfen <pem.accounts.s...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > If you use the qt creator which comes with suse this is no problem.
>>>>
>>>> okay, but Qt Creator 1.2 is really old?  I wonder how long until the
>>>> openSUSE repo has Qt Creator 2.0?  Plus, if I'm doing cross-platform
>>>> development...  Isn't it best to have Qt Creator 1.3 on all platforms?  
>>>> (And
>>>> Qt Creator 2.0 when it's released).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > You probably need to tell Qt Creator about your new Qt installation
>>>> > (Tools->Options->Qt4->Versions). It is a known issue in 1.3, that the
>>>> > installer writes the initial Qt Creator settings *for the root user* if 
>>>> > you
>>>> > install as root. So, if you'd start Qt Creator as root user, it would
>>>> > already know about the new Qt version in /opt, but if you start as any 
>>>> > other
>>>> > user, it doesn't and you have to tell it manually.
>>>>
>>>> You mean /opt/qtsdk-2010.02/qt/bin/qmake ?  Yes this worked.  However,
>>>> when I open a project, now it says I have to copy the project to a writable
>>>> location, to edit or compile the sample project.
>>>>
>>>> So, overall, I guess I generally understand the difference...
>>>> /opt/qtsdk-2010.02/ is read-only and meant for the system,.  While
>>>> /home/user/[my user name]/qtsdk-2010.02/ is writable and meant only for my
>>>> user.  However, I still don't know which is the "right" / "best" / "ideal"
>>>> choice.  Sounds like the default of ( /user/[my user name]/qtsdk-2010.02/ )
>>>> is easier... unless I missed something?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> thank you for info
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2010/5/3 Thorbjørn Lindeijer <thorbjorn.lindei...@nokia.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/30/2010 10:04 AM, ext Alex Richardson wrote:
>>>>> >> I wonder if Qt Creator should make /opt/qt-sdk-2010.02 the default
>>>>> >> install
>>>>> >> path (instead of /home/[user name]/qt-sdk-2010.02), since that's the
>>>>> >> official FHS standard.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The problem is that a normal user usually does not have write
>>>>> > permission to /opt/, so installing to
>>>>> > the home directory is safer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly. Also, when you run the installer as root, it already defaults
>>>>> to installing in /opt.
>>>>>
>>>>> That you don't get a GUI installer when running with sudo is strange.
>>>>> At
>>>>> least on Ubuntu this works fine for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Bjørn
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thorbjørn Lindeijer
>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>> Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Qt-creator mailing list
>>>>> Qt-creator@trolltech.com
>>>>> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-creator mailing list
> Qt-creator@trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>
>

_______________________________________________
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-creator@trolltech.com
http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator

Reply via email to