I have two dual-core Xeon 2.66GHz and build with five threads and it
only takes me ~45 minutes to build Qt without WebKit; did you forget
to disable demos and examples?

/s/ Adam

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Michael Jackson
<mike.jack...@bluequartz.net> wrote:
> 30 Minutes? For all of Qt? What hardware are you building on? I have an 8
> way Xeon Nehalem using GCC with 16 threads and it takes at least an hour or
> so to build with WebKit disabled...
>
> Mike Jackson
>
> On 7/8/10 3:00 PM, in article
> aanlktilfeinaqca9_lm9iw5ezkepn_nyoysgeds7x...@mail.gmail.com, "Coda
> Highland" wrote:
>
>> You can build QtWebKit that fast? *blink* I'd believe the 20 minute
>> figure if you disable QtWebKit but I think Creator needs it.
>>
>> /s/ Adam
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <rea...@arcor.de> wrote:
>>> Hours?  It only needs about 30 minutes to build on an (by now) old Core
>>> 2 Duo.  I even got it to 20 minutes if I disable stuff I don't need.
>>>
>>> It's really fast and easy to build your own binaries.  I highly
>>> recommend it :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/08/2010 09:30 PM, Coda Highland wrote:
>>>> Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild
>>>> process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building
>>>> four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if
>>>> you're not intending to distribute).
>>>>
>>>> /s/ Adam
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM,<kai.koe...@nokia.com>  wrote:
>>>>> Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this
>>>>>> mantra indefinitely. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for
>>>>> the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because
>>>>> that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while
>>>>> ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations
>>>>> in parallel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in
>>>>> contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile 
>>>>> Qt
>>>>> yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards
>>>>> isn't really a big hassle.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kai
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Qt-creator mailing list
>>>>> Qt-creator@trolltech.com
>>>>> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qt-creator mailing list
>>> Qt-creator@trolltech.com
>>> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-creator mailing list
> Qt-creator@trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>

_______________________________________________
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-creator@trolltech.com
http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator

Reply via email to