I have two dual-core Xeon 2.66GHz and build with five threads and it only takes me ~45 minutes to build Qt without WebKit; did you forget to disable demos and examples?
/s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Michael Jackson <mike.jack...@bluequartz.net> wrote: > 30 Minutes? For all of Qt? What hardware are you building on? I have an 8 > way Xeon Nehalem using GCC with 16 threads and it takes at least an hour or > so to build with WebKit disabled... > > Mike Jackson > > On 7/8/10 3:00 PM, in article > aanlktilfeinaqca9_lm9iw5ezkepn_nyoysgeds7x...@mail.gmail.com, "Coda > Highland" wrote: > >> You can build QtWebKit that fast? *blink* I'd believe the 20 minute >> figure if you disable QtWebKit but I think Creator needs it. >> >> /s/ Adam >> >> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <rea...@arcor.de> wrote: >>> Hours? It only needs about 30 minutes to build on an (by now) old Core >>> 2 Duo. I even got it to 20 minutes if I disable stuff I don't need. >>> >>> It's really fast and easy to build your own binaries. I highly >>> recommend it :) >>> >>> >>> On 07/08/2010 09:30 PM, Coda Highland wrote: >>>> Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild >>>> process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building >>>> four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if >>>> you're not intending to distribute). >>>> >>>> /s/ Adam >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM,<kai.koe...@nokia.com> wrote: >>>>> Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: >>>>>> >>>>>> Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this >>>>>> mantra indefinitely. ;-) >>>>> >>>>> I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for >>>>> the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because >>>>> that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while >>>>> ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations >>>>> in parallel. >>>>> >>>>> Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in >>>>> contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile >>>>> Qt >>>>> yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards >>>>> isn't really a big hassle. >>>>> >>>>> Kai >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Qt-creator mailing list >>>>> Qt-creator@trolltech.com >>>>> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator >>>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Qt-creator mailing list >>> Qt-creator@trolltech.com >>> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > Qt-creator@trolltech.com > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
