On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Francis. > > First of all, thanks for all the patches. However, if you wish to submit > these to be considered for merging with Qt Jambi, you would have to go > through the contribution system found at http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-jambi. > For legal reasons, we are not able to accept contributions outside of this > framework. >
OK, will do. > That said, I've looked over your patches quickly, and in order to be > accepted, you would at least have to remove the vim-specific comment in the > build.xml-file and we can unfortunately not accept the Apache-licensed > .jar-file from the revision of your second patch. Other than that, I think > the cleanups sound good, although we'd have to look closer at them. > OK. I'll send a mail when I'm done creating the git repository and uploading patches. For review, do you prefer to have it all on the same branch? What I've done in my local repos is create one branch per patch series, all branches being "on top" of the other. -- Francis Galiegue, [email protected] "It seems obvious [...] that at least some 'business intelligence' tools invest so much intelligence on the business side that they have nothing left for generating SQL queries" (Stéphane Faroult, in "The Art of SQL", ISBN 0-596-00894-5) _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
