On 2002/07/29 22:19, Clark Martin, [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote:
> Look at the Quadra 650 in those specs, it is the same MB as the Q800
> and WGS80 but has 80nS RAM specified. I've used 70nS in several Q800
> and a WGS 80 with no problem. In fact I had put 60nS in them at
> first because of the incorrect info out there. But it wasn't
> necessary.
Believe me: I believe you concerning this. But I'm still curious about:
>> BTW: All my 4 Q800's are getting very instable using any RAM-stick slower
>> <60ns. This happens with ALL RAM-comb., using 1, more or all sticks <60ns .
>> Don't tell me I'm the lucky owner of 4 exceptional Q800's!
>> {However I must say I sometimes meet Macs (made for the non-US-market) with
>> diff. specs, but concerning this?)
>>
>> AAA: I'm very curious about your point of view.
> Apple Spec and other sources are known for having errors. Apple
> rarely corrects errors of this sort, especially once the model is out
> of production. I suspect that Apple either made an error in the
> original spec for the Q800 & WGS80 or was being conservative and spec
> them the same as the Q840AV.
Very reasonable explanation!
greetings,
Joe
--
Quadlist is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...
Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A |
-- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299 | Free iBook! |
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
Quadlist info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/quadlist.shtml>
The FAQ: <http://macfaq.org/>
Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/quadlist%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
