On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, Daniel Walton wrote:
Paul have you floated this by idr? I think it would be good to put
together a draft and throw it out there for feedback before committing
anything.
Well, I guess that depends on whether people think it's useful.
I certainly think it'd be useful to be able to change the decision
process, including the default. Having BGP speakers be able to help
minimise the risks to operators and help deployment (clearly defined
behaviour on mismatch, rather than unknown weird behaviour) seems like it
could be useful.
Question is, whether others agree. I thought it'd be good to get opinion
on that here first, by posting a patch, before seeing about a draft. :)
Also, on practicalities, if we wanted to apply that patch it'd be good to
have an assigned capability code. Otherwise, it'd need another tweak to
add some magic to the cap to differentiate our private-vendor cap for that
code from any others. ;)
regards,
--
Paul Jakma, HPE Networking, Advanced Technology Group
Fortune:
If I'm over the hill, why is it I don't recall ever being on top?
-- Jerry Muscha
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
