Isn't that the purpose of exit? The command ' already there, it's just
missing from config_write...
Lou
On January 4, 2016 9:42:47 PM Donald Sharp <[email protected]> wrote:
Why not use '!' instead of 'exit'. I assume the goal is to signal that we
are done route-map input.
I would prefer that we come up with a methodology to handle this for all
end blocks, instead of just for route-maps.
donald
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote:
The last route-map written to config should have an "exit" at the end to
return to the main node from route-map processing.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <[email protected]>
---
lib/routemap.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/routemap.c b/lib/routemap.c
index 7302e23..116c8bd 100644
--- a/lib/routemap.c
+++ b/lib/routemap.c
@@ -1288,6 +1288,8 @@ route_map_config_write (struct vty *vty)
write++;
}
+ if (!first)
+ vty_out (vty, " exit%s", VTY_NEWLINE);
return write;
}
--
2.1.3
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
