On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Lou Berger wrote:
On 1/5/2016 9:10 AM, Donald Sharp wrote:
I'm not sure that exit is the right way to go here, or at least I
would like some sort of agreement from everyone on what is the right
thing to write and then to actually make the cli entirely consistent
along these lines.
WFM
Can you help me get a deeper understanding on what the goal/motivation
of this patch is? Why only route-maps are we worrying about sub-modes?
I'm sure it's simply because we hit this case in one of our ad-hoc
tests. So we simply fixed this case.
Lou
Was there a conclusion to this? You re-subbed the patch after this
thread.
What was the failing test?
The config file parser doesn't need 'exit', but does a walk back up the
vty node tree (minimal as that tree tends to be) for non-matching
commands.
Is this dealing with a problem in the quagga code, or a problem in
someone's test-harness?
regards,
--
Paul Jakma p...@jakma.org @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
You will be a winner today. Pick a fight with a four-year-old.
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
