Hi Donald, all, Concerning the Maintainer document, I add a comment I would discuss on the mailing list.
Is there room to define a new role named 'Reviewer' that stand between contributor and maintainer. I mean volunteer who could help maintainer to review code, that have some write access to patchwork (or equivalent tool if we change) to ACk/Nack patches and limited access to git i.e. only write access on dedicated branch as suggested in the Quagga process document. Comments ? Regards Olivier Le 14/06/2016 18:55, Donald Sharp a écrit : > Next Tuesday we have the normal monthly meeting. If you have anything that > you would like to discuss please let me know so I can add it to the agenda. > > I'd like to discuss and vote on the 3 documents: > > Maintainer: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/19DZcT0cJUSYxVIFenHvGFhLLUmLTRFHuMNZcI7aUNGA/edit?usp=sharing > > Tools: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s_EbbXwqWPmfOg6ArgKmEMm_iv0vwGvJs-7ZG4yFKb4/edit?usp=sharing > > Quagga Process: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xYrpTKYDvK23BCxXP-dbE6nOuvBxbGIilNLfVkI3j-I/edit?usp=sharing > > Please take the time to read/discuss. > > thanks! > > donald > > > _______________________________________________ > Quagga-dev mailing list > Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net > https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
