I'll second that. Well done Steve. On Jan 31, 6:46 pm, Ian Harrison <bighatp...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Well done Steve. This is good news for the marque! > > Ian > > On 31 Jan 2012, at 17:43, Steve Kodz <st...@h4-turbo.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I've been told to expect the QMOPS project to be featured in the April > > edition of Practical Classics, in the Resto News section. Let's see what > > they write... > > > Regards, > > Steve > > -- > >www.h4-turbo.co.uk > >www.quantumowners.co.uk > >www.quantumcars.co.uk > >www.quantumkitcars.co.uk > >www.quantumheritage.co.uk > > > On Tuesday 31 Jan 2012, Eddie wrote: > >> Hi Guys > > >> I can see that my involvement could be seen with conflict of intrest. > >> Therfore I will not follow it up. Steve is the better person here. > > >> Darn it a pain, there's still a lot of me who thinks club :-) > > >> Good luck guys. I think that you are correct. We own and drive > >> fantastic cars that have never been recognised properly. > >> I really hope you succeed. > > >> If I can help in any way, you know, you just have to ask. > > >> Eddie > > >> On Jan 31, 6:57 am, jin <jinmys...@btinternet.com> wrote: > >>> I think it would serve to be a great thing to get our cars featured > >>> and some interest gained is much needed, in my mind QMOPS is perfect > >>> as an introduction to the marque – a foot in the door so to speak with > >>> the classic car fraternity since its an epic restoration and will > >>> serve to get Quantum on the map in the classic car world, the rest of > >>> the time honoured cars could follow, it may be worth a few of us > >>> sending in bits for the readers cars sections alongside this to gain > >>> familiarity for the readers, ive 100s of before and after pics of my > >>> 2+2 restoration albeit on a less epic scale that id be happy to offer > >>> up if that would seem like a good idea? > > >>> I know for a fact that as has been said, practical classics has > >>> featured all manner of modern-ish cars like MX5s and such like, and > >>> they have featured low run and component cars too, I see no reason why > >>> they should not feature any of the Quantums especially since I know > >>> many owners drive them daily – practical and classic. > >>> I feel quite strongly about our cars getting the recognition they > >>> deserve so if I can help out in any way im more than happy to > > >>> On Jan 30, 9:02 pm, Steve Kodz <st...@h4-turbo.co.uk> wrote: > >>>> I can make the initial contact, as I am part of the QMOPS > >>>> sub-committee, hence I could be seen as less of a conflict of > >>>> interest. I have plenty of photos etc and all the information he > >>>> might require. > > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Steve > >>>> --www.h4-turbo.co.ukwww.quantumowners.co.ukwww.quantumcars.co.ukwww.q > >>>> ua... > > >>>> On Monday 30 Jan 2012, MatthewG wrote: > >>>>> Hi Eddie, > > >>>>> That was pretty much all the details. It was from a post on the > >>>>> Practical Classics Facebook page. The full text was: > > >>>>> "Are you embarking on a heroic restoration? We'd like to know what > >>>>> you're getting up to in your garage or workshop with the view of > >>>>> possibly publishing some of them, so if you'd like the chance to > >>>>> see your project in print, email Sam on > >>>>> sam.glo...@practicalclassics.c o.uk with a few pics of your car, > >>>>> and a few words about your intentions. The more of a rotter it is, > >>>>> the better! > >>>>> We look forward to hearing from you. Cheers, Neil." > > >>>>> I thought of QMOPS because our cars are now older than some of the > >>>>> ones they've featured and we've also got rarity on our side. I > >>>>> always felt that the factory-build cars were the Wooldridge's > >>>>> effort to get into the same kind of league as TVR, Lotus, Gordon > >>>>> Keeble, Reliant and so on (all of which have been featured at some > >>>>> point). > > >>>>> Matthew > > >>>>> On Jan 30, 8:15 pm, Eddie <erus...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > >>>>>> Hi Jin > > >>>>>> Can you get the contact details to me please. I will follow this > >>>>>> up > > >>>>>> Eddie- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text - > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Quantum Owners Group" group. > > To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en > > > IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As > > Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum > > Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or > > in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any > > person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or > > alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained > > within this or related message(s).
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
