I think I've just come across a bug (or possibly 2) in the CIFilter patch. 1. My offsetting problem was solved by setting the 'Show Advanced Filter Options' checkbox. I didn't change any of the settings from their default values though. This may or may not be a bug, so if this is expected behaviour with the QTZ I forgot to send attached to the last email, I'd love someone to explain why.
2. I had a related CIFilter with various different reflection kernel functions (reflect on Y-axis, reflect on both X abd Y-axes, 'flipped' versions of each), and I was using an __index input to the JavaScript portion of the CIFilter to switch between the different variations. After enabling the 'Show Advanced Filter Options' checkbox for the filter, I am only able to input values of 0 and 1 to the __index input. Where previously the control showed-up on the 'Input Parameters' panel for the patch as a rotary control that could be set to any Integer value, it's not a slider with a range of 0 > 1. Can anyone confirm the above? I'm attaching the QTZ I referred to in my previous post. Though I've solved the problem, I'd still like to know if the extra JS ROI.DoD functions were actually necessary in this case, and, now, if the fact the filter failed to work as expected is due to a bug in QC, or a bug in my code. Cheers, a|x http://machinesdontcare.wordpress.com
ReflectTest.qtz
Description: application/quartzcomposer
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
