On 09/22/2016 07:12 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:56:57PM -0700, Connor Page wrote:
In fact, I think the right question is "Will Qubes 4 be compatible with btrfs root
if vm storage is expected to reside on a LVM thin pool?"
This is a good question. The new storage handling is flexible enough to
allow writing a module to handle btrfs even better than in Qubes 3.x.
But it is unlikely that we'll manage to write such module for 4.0. If
someone would contribute such module, then yes - it will be supported.
Otherwise, probably somehow around 4.1 or later.
- --
You realize that some of us have been happily using btrfs features with
Qubes in a way that produces better work flows?
If ITL desires a modular storage layer, wouldn't the best approach be to
offer a general image file module *first* to emulate the current
architecture? That way, people can continue to have the same storage
choices and backup procedures they already do.
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/3b8adced-078d-8776-93b6-a212eed2e186%40openmailbox.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
