Anyway people, even if he was saying the truth. Then why is he silent then ? Why doesn't he have joined purism or coreboot or qubes or others to neut the ME?
The difference between reality and what can be real is really thin and it's often easier to believe what could be then what really is. First you need to indentify the goal and here it is not clear. Do you know why ? Because it would mean that Chinese could get access to it with enough intelligence. Russian could get access to it. And what you are calling Odin so the NSA or any other entity, don't want all that because it would mean that even them are at risk ;) which is clearly not the goal. You don't want to implement something that you can not control. So it's easier to find an exploit, there are enough of them. Or to create one within software or OS where you can patch it easily than in hardware. The real threat from all time, is not the intelligence services, it's the companies. Anything else doesn't matter. Obtenez Outlook pour iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: qubes-users@googlegroups.com <qubes-users@googlegroups.com> on behalf of awokd <aw...@elude.in> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2018 4:38:08 PM To: qubes-users Subject: Re: [qubes-users] Intel ME Backdoor, called Odin's Eye On Thu, May 10, 2018 12:37 am, dangmad...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 2:02:36 PM UTC-8, awokd wrote: >> I don't trust ME either and run me_cleaner but that link is just some >> unsubstantiated text. If he'd really been working at Intel 15 years he >> should have been able to get copies of internal documentation at least. >> A >> blacked out W-2 form doesn't cut it either. > > Do you find that sticking your head in the sand to be a productive form > of security? How does requiring proof instead of an anecdote equate to sticking one's head in the sand? Do you believe all scientists are sticking their head in the sand when they do research? > I'm sorry that this information upset you so much, but by denying it > you're only putting others in harms way. What gave you the impression I was upset? > Maybe you'd like for others to have security vulnerabilities? No, that's why I encourage them to use Qubes. I think you must be new here. Check out some of my other posts. > Perhaps you are exposing your agenda too much? Re-read the first sentence of what I wrote above, perhaps more slowly this time, then explain what agenda it is you think I have. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/5cca9a5a8bfd3e53a8a53f1e560dfda1%40elude.in. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/AM5P190MB03374A2B4B81C19532CBE1EAAB9E0%40AM5P190MB0337.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
