On 3/30/19 12:25 PM, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
Chris Laprise wrote on 3/30/19 2:44 AM:
On 3/29/19 7:18 PM, [email protected] wrote:
https://github.com/system76/coreboot

Clearly they think they can handle modern hardware. Makes me wonder why the coreboot folks have thrown up [their?] hands and declared defeat.

If I understand it right, on newer Intel systems Coreboot is limited to only calling closed-source, proprietary initialization procedures versus older systems where it handles the entire process (less some binary blobs).

Maybe they see something they can no longer stomach.

I bought my first AMD system this week.

Welcome to the club! Hope they don't continue following Intel's path with closed-source PSP etc.

I agree. But even so, AMD are better by some noticeable margin.

Intel... OMGWTF. With the 'VISA' exploit they're contradicting the researchers, and with 'Foreshadow' they said app programmers should deal with it.

BTW, like some other Qubers I got a G505s with the AMD A10. Still need to figure out how to flash it.

--

Chris Laprise, [email protected]
https://github.com/tasket
https://twitter.com/ttaskett
PGP: BEE2 20C5 356E 764A 73EB  4AB3 1DC4 D106 F07F 1886

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/d3c273a0-4cf2-86f0-a433-1f8f1244317a%40posteo.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to