On 3/31/19 10:36 AM, unman wrote:
I'm not convinced about Debian packages being more secure than rpm: they are, of course nicer. :-)
To me, its a matter of Fedora packages being less secure than *everyone else*.
I'm a long standing Debian user with an antipathy to RedHat and Fedora. The biggest drawback in using Debian packages in Qubes is that they are configured on install, which requires some user intervention across various qubes. Fedora doesnt do this, I think.
Shouldn't it be possible to run 'apt' in a mode where it accepts the default (not always 'yes') response?
The qubes-multi-update script already does this when run in unattended mode and I've never had a problem with it, even in highly customized Debian templates.
-- Chris Laprise, tas...@posteo.net https://github.com/tasket https://twitter.com/ttaskett PGP: BEE2 20C5 356E 764A 73EB 4AB3 1DC4 D106 F07F 1886 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/f3075d83-a02e-f49d-abc8-76ffc4bfed3d%40posteo.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
