Steve Kostecke wrote: > It has been repeatedly demonstrated that no client symlink is necessary > on Linux and FreeBSD. > > Perhaps a client symlink is necessary on Windows. But I have no way of > verifying this fact and would consider it to be a bug. > >
Symlinks are hard to implement on Windows. Shortcuts are not really the same thing and you can be surprised by shortcut files, yes files. Windows provides no tools for creating a symlink. On Windows you are better or just giving the file the name you need. Danny _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
